George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins has 158% more |
| Protein | 8 g ★ | 2.01 g | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins has 298% more |
| Carbs | 46 g ★ | 20.71 g | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins has 122% more |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins has 1100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 345 mg | 36 mg ★ | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins has 858% more |
| Calcium | 180 mg ★ | 38 mg | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins has 374% more |
| Iron | 1.4 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | George Weston Bakeries, Thomas English Muffins has 103% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.