Ham, chopped, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ham, chopped, canned
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Ham, chopped, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Ham, chopped, canned has 166% more |
| Protein | 16.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | Ham, chopped, canned has 699% more |
| Carbs | 0.26 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Fat | 18.83 g | 0.15 g ★ | Ham, chopped, canned has 12453% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1280 mg | 36 mg ★ | Ham, chopped, canned has 3456% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.95 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Ham, chopped, canned has 38% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Potassium | 284 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.