Ham, chopped, not canned vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ham, chopped, not canned
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Ham, chopped, not canned | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 221 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 84% more |
| Protein | 16.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Ham, chopped, not canned has 275% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 1.92 g ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 770% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 5 g | 0.87 g ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 475% more |
| Sodium | 1194 mg | 7 mg ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 16957% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Iron | 0.83 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 44% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg ★ | 172 mg | Ham, chopped, not canned has 85% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.