Ham salad spread vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ham salad spread
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Ham salad spread | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Ham salad spread has 140% more |
| Protein | 8.68 g ★ | 2.01 g | Ham salad spread has 332% more |
| Carbs | 10.64 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Fat | 15.53 g | 0.15 g ★ | Ham salad spread has 10253% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1075 mg | 36 mg ★ | Ham salad spread has 2886% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.59 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 150 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.