Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 164 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has 82% more |
| Protein | 16.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has 726% more |
| Carbs | 3.63 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has 5767% more |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 1 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sodium | 814 mg | 36 mg ★ | Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has 2161% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Iron | 1.02 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has 48% more |
| Vitamin C | 4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Potassium | 287 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.