Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium has 57% more |
| Protein | 18.52 g ★ | 2.01 g | Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium has 821% more |
| Carbs | 10.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Fat | 2.71 g | 0.15 g ★ | Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium has 1707% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 10.68 g | 6.48 g ★ | Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium has 65% more |
| Sodium | 1062 mg | 36 mg ★ | Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium has 2850% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Ham, smoked, extra lean, low sodium has 10% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 330 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.