Jams, preserves, marmalade, reduced sugar vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Jams, preserves, marmalade, reduced sugar
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Jams, preserves, marmalade, reduced sugar | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 151 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Jams, preserves, marmalade, reduced sugar has 68% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 37.6 g ★ | 20.71 g | Jams, preserves, marmalade, reduced sugar has 82% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Sugar | 29.41 g | 6.48 g ★ | Jams, preserves, marmalade, reduced sugar has 354% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 15 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
| Potassium | 59 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.