Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
Nutrient Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 37 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more
Protein 3.68 g 2.01 g Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 83% more
Carbs 7.29 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more
Fat 0.2 g 0.15 g Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 33% more
Fiber 2 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more
Sugar 1 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more
Sodium 247 mg 36 mg Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 586% more
Calcium 211 mg 38 mg Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 455% more
Iron 3.14 mg 0.69 mg Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 355% more
Vitamin C 33 mg 19.6 mg Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 68% more
Potassium 550 mg 475 mg Jute, potherb, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 16% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.