Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 337 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled has 274% more |
| Protein | 12.45 g ★ | 2.01 g | Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled has 519% more |
| Carbs | 5.03 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Fat | 29.68 g | 0.15 g ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled has 19687% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 2.39 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Sodium | 1062 mg | 36 mg ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled has 2850% more |
| Calcium | 42 mg ★ | 38 mg | Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled has 11% more |
| Iron | 0.99 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Kielbasa, fully cooked, grilled has 43% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
| Potassium | 306 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.