Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried has 270% more |
| Protein | 12.36 g ★ | 2.01 g | Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried has 515% more |
| Carbs | 4.78 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Fat | 29.43 g | 0.15 g ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried has 19520% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 2.38 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Sodium | 1046 mg | 36 mg ★ | Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried has 2806% more |
| Calcium | 40 mg ★ | 38 mg | Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried has 5% more |
| Iron | 0.93 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Kielbasa, fully cooked, pan-fried has 35% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 17% more |
| Potassium | 304 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.