Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 32 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Protein | 3.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 59% more |
| Carbs | 5 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 367% more |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Sugar | 0.62 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Sodium | 265 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 636% more |
| Calcium | 258 mg ★ | 38 mg | Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 579% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 1% more |
| Vitamin C | 37 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Lambsquarters, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 89% more |
| Potassium | 288 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.