Luncheon slices, meatless vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Luncheon slices, meatless
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Luncheon slices, meatless | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 189 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Luncheon slices, meatless has 110% more |
| Protein | 17.78 g ★ | 2.01 g | Luncheon slices, meatless has 785% more |
| Carbs | 4.44 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Fat | 11.11 g | 0.15 g ★ | Luncheon slices, meatless has 7307% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Sugar | 2.22 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Sodium | 711 mg | 36 mg ★ | Luncheon slices, meatless has 1875% more |
| Calcium | 41 mg ★ | 38 mg | Luncheon slices, meatless has 8% more |
| Iron | 1.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Luncheon slices, meatless has 161% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 200 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.