Malabar spinach, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Malabar spinach, cooked
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Malabar spinach, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 23 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Protein | 2.98 g ★ | 2.01 g | Malabar spinach, cooked has 48% more |
| Carbs | 2.71 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Fat | 0.78 g | 0.15 g ★ | Malabar spinach, cooked has 420% more |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 55 mg | 36 mg ★ | Malabar spinach, cooked has 53% more |
| Calcium | 124 mg ★ | 38 mg | Malabar spinach, cooked has 226% more |
| Iron | 1.48 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Malabar spinach, cooked has 114% more |
| Vitamin C | 5.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Potassium | 256 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.