Meat extender vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Meat extender
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Meat extender | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 311 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Meat extender has 246% more |
| Protein | 41.71 g ★ | 2.01 g | Meat extender has 1975% more |
| Carbs | 34.71 g ★ | 20.71 g | Meat extender has 68% more |
| Fat | 2.97 g | 0.15 g ★ | Meat extender has 1880% more |
| Fiber | 17.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Meat extender has 430% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Calcium | 204 mg ★ | 38 mg | Meat extender has 437% more |
| Iron | 11.99 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Meat extender has 1638% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 1902 mg ★ | 475 mg | Meat extender has 300% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.