Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 57 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more
Protein 3.43 g 2.01 g Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar has 71% more
Carbs 7.68 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more
Fat 1.04 g 0.15 g Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar has 593% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 7.29 g 6.48 g Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar has 13% more
Sodium 66 mg 36 mg Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar has 83% more
Calcium 122 mg 38 mg Milk, chocolate, lowfat, reduced sugar has 221% more
Iron 0.16 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 168 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.