Milk, filled, fluid, with lauric acid oil vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Milk, filled, fluid, with lauric acid oil
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Milk, filled, fluid, with lauric acid oil | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 63 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Protein | 3.33 g ★ | 2.01 g | Milk, filled, fluid, with lauric acid oil has 66% more |
| Carbs | 4.74 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Milk, filled, fluid, with lauric acid oil has 2167% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 4.74 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Sodium | 57 mg | 36 mg ★ | Milk, filled, fluid, with lauric acid oil has 58% more |
| Calcium | 128 mg ★ | 38 mg | Milk, filled, fluid, with lauric acid oil has 237% more |
| Iron | 0.05 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Potassium | 139 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.