Milk substitutes, fluid, with lauric acid oil vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Milk substitutes, fluid, with lauric acid oil
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Milk substitutes, fluid, with lauric acid oil | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 61 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Protein | 1.75 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Carbs | 6.16 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Fat | 3.41 g | 0.15 g ★ | Milk substitutes, fluid, with lauric acid oil has 2173% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 78 mg | 36 mg ★ | Milk substitutes, fluid, with lauric acid oil has 117% more |
| Calcium | 33 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Iron | 0.39 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 114 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.