Millet flour vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Millet flour
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Millet flour | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 382 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Millet flour has 324% more |
| Protein | 10.75 g ★ | 2.01 g | Millet flour has 435% more |
| Carbs | 75.12 g ★ | 20.71 g | Millet flour has 263% more |
| Fat | 4.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | Millet flour has 2733% more |
| Fiber | 3.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Millet flour has 6% more |
| Sugar | 1.66 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 3.94 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Millet flour has 471% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 224 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.