Mollusks, conch, baked or broiled vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Mollusks, conch, baked or broiled
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Mollusks, conch, baked or broiled | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Mollusks, conch, baked or broiled has 8% more |
| Protein | 26.3 g ★ | 4.4 g | Mollusks, conch, baked or broiled has 498% more |
| Carbs | 1.7 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 92% more |
| Fat | 1.2 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 38% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 153 mg | 7 mg ★ | Mollusks, conch, baked or broiled has 2086% more |
| Calcium | 98 mg ★ | 17 mg | Mollusks, conch, baked or broiled has 476% more |
| Iron | 1.41 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
| Potassium | 163 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.