Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 54 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 55% more |
| Protein | 0.66 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 85% more |
| Carbs | 11.74 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 45% more |
| Fat | 0.49 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 61% more |
| Sugar | 0.19 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 78% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg | 7 mg ★ | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) has 14% more |
| Calcium | 96 mg ★ | 17 mg | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) has 465% more |
| Iron | 2.92 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) has 96% more |
| Potassium | 58 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.