Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo)
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 54 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Protein | 0.66 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Carbs | 11.74 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
| Fat | 0.49 g | 0.15 g ★ | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) has 227% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Sugar | 0.19 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Calcium | 96 mg ★ | 38 mg | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) has 153% more |
| Iron | 2.92 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Mush, blue corn with ash (Navajo) has 323% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 58 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.