Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 234 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo) has 160% more |
| Protein | 33.43 g ★ | 2.01 g | Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo) has 1563% more |
| Carbs | 0.08 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 11.09 g | 0.15 g ★ | Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo) has 7293% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 135 mg | 36 mg ★ | Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo) has 275% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 4.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Mutton, cooked, roasted (Navajo) has 590% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 409 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.