Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 492 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 447% more |
| Protein | 7.23 g ★ | 2.01 g | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 260% more |
| Carbs | 63.51 g ★ | 20.71 g | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 207% more |
| Fat | 23.21 g | 0.15 g ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 15373% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Sugar | 8.14 g | 6.48 g ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 26% more |
| Sodium | 882 mg | 36 mg ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 2350% more |
| Calcium | 154 mg ★ | 38 mg | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 305% more |
| Iron | 4.47 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Nabisco, Nabisco Ritz Crackers has 548% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 119 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.