New Zealand spinach, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
New Zealand spinach, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | New Zealand spinach, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 14 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 66% more |
| Carbs | 2.5 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 90% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 46% more |
| Sugar | 0.29 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 67% more |
| Sodium | 130 mg | 7 mg ★ | New Zealand spinach, raw has 1757% more |
| Calcium | 58 mg ★ | 17 mg | New Zealand spinach, raw has 241% more |
| Iron | 0.8 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 46% more |
| Vitamin C | 30 mg ★ | 0 mg | New Zealand spinach, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 130 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.