Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 351 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 193% more |
| Protein | 0.16 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 96% more |
| Carbs | 86.09 g ★ | 21.3 g | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 304% more |
| Fat | 0.06 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 97% more |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg | 7 mg ★ | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 43% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg ★ | 17 mg | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 47% more |
| Iron | 2.17 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 46% more |
| Potassium | 10 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.