Nopales, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Nopales, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Nopales, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 16 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Protein | 1.32 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Carbs | 3.33 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Fat | 0.09 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Sugar | 1.15 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Sodium | 21 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Calcium | 164 mg ★ | 38 mg | Nopales, raw has 332% more |
| Iron | 0.59 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 9.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Potassium | 257 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.