Oat flour, partially debranned vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oat flour, partially debranned
6 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Oat flour, partially debranned | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 404 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 175% more |
| Protein | 14.66 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 51% more |
| Carbs | 65.7 g ★ | 0 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 0% more |
| Fat | 9.12 g | 2.08 g ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 338% more |
| Fiber | 6.5 g ★ | 0 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 0% more |
| Sugar | 0.8 g | 0 g ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 0% more |
| Sodium | 19 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 81% more |
| Calcium | 55 mg ★ | 9 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 511% more |
| Iron | 4 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 463% more |
| Potassium | 371 mg ★ | 249 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 49% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.