Papad vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Papad
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Papad | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 371 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Papad has 312% more |
| Protein | 25.56 g ★ | 2.01 g | Papad has 1172% more |
| Carbs | 59.87 g ★ | 20.71 g | Papad has 189% more |
| Fat | 3.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | Papad has 2067% more |
| Fiber | 18.6 g ★ | 3.3 g | Papad has 464% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1745 mg | 36 mg ★ | Papad has 4747% more |
| Calcium | 143 mg ★ | 38 mg | Papad has 276% more |
| Iron | 7.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Papad has 1030% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 1000 mg ★ | 475 mg | Papad has 111% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.