Parsnips, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Parsnips, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Parsnips, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 75 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 17% more |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Carbs | 17.99 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Parsnips, raw has 100% more |
| Fiber | 4.9 g ★ | 3.3 g | Parsnips, raw has 48% more |
| Sugar | 4.8 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Calcium | 36 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Iron | 0.59 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 17 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Potassium | 375 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.