Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free has 6% more |
| Protein | 19.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free has 875% more |
| Carbs | 1.54 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Fat | 1.16 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free has 673% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1010 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free has 2706% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 2.78 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free has 303% more |
| Vitamin C | 34.6 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Pastrami, beef, 98% fat-free has 77% more |
| Potassium | 228 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.