Peppers, sweet, red, sauteed vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Peppers, sweet, red, sauteed
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Peppers, sweet, red, sauteed | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Peppers, sweet, red, sauteed has 48% more |
| Protein | 1.04 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Carbs | 6.57 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Fat | 12.75 g | 0.15 g ★ | Peppers, sweet, red, sauteed has 8400% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 4.28 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Sodium | 21 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Vitamin C | 162.8 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Peppers, sweet, red, sauteed has 731% more |
| Potassium | 193 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.