Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 548 kcal 90 kcal Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked has 509% more
Protein 35.73 g 2.01 g Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked has 1678% more
Carbs 1.35 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more
Fat 43.27 g 0.15 g Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked has 28747% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 2193 mg 36 mg Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked has 5992% more
Calcium 10 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more
Iron 1.49 mg 0.69 mg Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked has 116% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 539 mg 475 mg Pork, cured, bacon, cooked, baked has 13% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.