Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 99% more |
| Protein | 16.09 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 700% more |
| Carbs | 1.35 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Fat | 12.13 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 7987% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.88 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Sodium | 990 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 2650% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 0.64 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 7% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 213 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.