Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 234 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 160% more |
| Protein | 18.17 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 804% more |
| Carbs | 1.42 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Fat | 17.29 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 11427% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.99 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sodium | 945 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 2525% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 45% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 216 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.