Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 132 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted has 47% more |
| Protein | 21.69 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted has 979% more |
| Carbs | 1.26 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Fat | 4.45 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted has 2867% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 1.26 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Sodium | 1045 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted has 2803% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 1.17 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, heated, roasted has 70% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 224 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.