Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 113 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only has 26% more |
| Protein | 17.53 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only has 772% more |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Fat | 4.18 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only has 2687% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 1.06 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Sodium | 1090 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only has 2928% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.97 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, unheated, separable lean only has 41% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 234 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.