Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 149 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 66% more |
| Protein | 13.69 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 581% more |
| Carbs | 2.72 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Fat | 9.29 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 6093% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.85 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Sodium | 1099 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 2953% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham and water product, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 101% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 205 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.