Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 172 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked has 91% more |
| Protein | 22.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked has 1009% more |
| Carbs | 0.3 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked has 5433% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 969 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked has 2592% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 1.37 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham, low sodium, lean and fat, cooked has 99% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 386 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.