Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 191 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 112% more |
| Protein | 24.39 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 1113% more |
| Carbs | 0.64 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Fat | 9.35 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 6133% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.64 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Sodium | 810 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 2150% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 1.42 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 106% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 356 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.