Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 161 kcal 90 kcal Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 79% more
Protein 20.1 g 2.01 g Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 900% more
Carbs 0.99 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more
Fat 8.56 g 0.15 g Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 5607% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0.78 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more
Sodium 1101 mg 36 mg Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 2958% more
Calcium 8 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more
Iron 0.69 mg 0.69 mg Equal
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 244 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.