Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 6% more |
| Protein | 15.43 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 668% more |
| Carbs | 0.67 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Fat | 3.48 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 2220% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.67 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Sodium | 1170 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 3150% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 1.13 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, rump, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 64% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 205 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.