Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 86% more |
| Protein | 16.65 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 728% more |
| Carbs | 0.66 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Fat | 11.02 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 7247% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.66 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Sodium | 964 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 2578% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 219 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.