Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 1% more |
| Protein | 18.65 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 828% more |
| Carbs | 0.71 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Fat | 1.87 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 1147% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.71 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Sodium | 1040 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 2789% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean only, unheated has 10% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 229 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.