Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 164 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 82% more |
| Protein | 15.73 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 683% more |
| Carbs | 1.1 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Fat | 10.77 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 7080% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 1.1 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Sodium | 1011 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 2708% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.98 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham -- water added, slice, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 213 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.