Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted has 74% more |
| Protein | 25.05 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted has 1146% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted has 3567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1327 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted has 3586% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.94 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham, whole, separable lean only, roasted has 36% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 316 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.