Pork, fresh, backfat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, backfat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, backfat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 812 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, backfat, raw has 802% more |
| Protein | 2.92 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, backfat, raw has 45% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 88.69 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, backfat, raw has 59027% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 2 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Iron | 0.18 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 65 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.