Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked has 161% more |
| Protein | 26.07 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked has 1197% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 13.66 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked has 9007% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 55 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked has 53% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Iron | 0.93 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed retail cuts (loin and shoulder blade), separable lean and fat, cooked has 35% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 345 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.