Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 175 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 94% more |
| Protein | 28.69 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 1327% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.83 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 3787% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 84 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 133% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 0.92 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), shank half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 376 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.