Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 626 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked has 596% more |
| Protein | 7.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked has 251% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 66.1 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked has 43967% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 56 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, fresh, separable fat, cooked has 56% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.46 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.