Pork, fresh, separable fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, separable fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, separable fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 632 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, separable fat, raw has 602% more |
| Protein | 9.25 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, separable fat, raw has 360% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 65.7 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, separable fat, raw has 43700% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 47 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, fresh, separable fat, raw has 31% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 0.26 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 333 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.